Peter Ginakes - Lawyer in Winnipeg, Manitoba - Clearway Law

Peter Ginakes

Ginakes Law Office | Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

A lawyer since 2015

(3.0)

Based on 1 Reviews

Send an email to Peter Ginakes:

Optional
Max. 500 characters

Customer Reviews

avatar
Anonymous

(2024-01-27)

3 out of 5 stars

My review is focused on Peter Ginakes' role in the complex legal situation surrounding the 800 Adele Ave. lease, a case that ended up entangled in Manitoba's legal and political landscape.

Navigating a Complex Legal Battle

Peter's initiation of a $7.4-million lawsuit against the Manitoba government was a significant move, showcasing his willingness to engage in complex legal battles. This action, stemming from the termination of a 20-year lease intended for a facility aiding at-risk youth, highlights Peter's commitment to agreements and his readiness to seek justice when he perceives a breach of contract.

Facing Government Power

The unique twist in this saga was the Manitoba government's utilization of a 2019 law to invalidate the lawsuit. Peter's case was against a powerful adversary using rare legislative powers. This scenario illustrates the challenging environment in which Peter operated, dealing with unexpected and formidable legal maneuvers.

Information

Current Status:
Active
Practice Areas:
Education:
Law, Southwestern Law School logo Southwestern Law School, 2014
Firm Name:
Ginakes Law Office
Location:
666 Leila Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R2V 3N7
More Information:

In a bold move, the Manitoba government wielded an unusual legislative power to squash a $7.4-million lawsuit. This legal drama, initiated by Peter Ginakes and associates, stemmed from a scrapped 20-year lease for a facility catering to at-risk youth. The twist came in February, when a Court of Queen's Bench justice axed the lawsuit, citing a specific 2019 provincial law.

A Rare Legislative Play

This law, crafted in 2019, allowed the government to wriggle free from the 800 Adele Ave. lease. More intriguingly, it blocked any subsequent legal challenges. Legal buffs note that this kind of governmental power play is rare. Justice Theodor Bock highlighted this unique legislation as the basis for his decision to dismiss the lawsuit, emphasizing its explicit and definitive wording.

Unsettling Implications

Dave Hill, a senior partner at Hill Sokalski Walsh, expressed alarm at the government's abrupt contract termination. He argued that a government-backed lease should symbolize stability and security, not uncertainty and abrupt cancellations.

Controversy at 800 Adele

The lawsuit's dismissal followed a labyrinth of motions and appeals linked to the contentious legislation. The 800 Adele Ave. saga has been mired in controversy, especially after a 2016 audit revealed significant irregularities, including a lease cost suspiciously double the market rate.

Troubled Lease History

Initially, the lease involved the Southern First Nations Network of Care and a company owning the 800 Adele Ave. property. Marymound sub-leased the 18,000-square-foot facility for housing vulnerable youth. With the Southern Authority, overseeing multiple child services agencies, footing the bill, the lease seemed secure. But the political undercurrents were strong, with accusations that the Progressive Conservative government's actions were motivated by vindictiveness against Ginakes for his involvement in the Tiger Dams scandal under the previous NDP administration.

A Political Web

The lease, approved by lawyers of the then-NDP government, was signed in 2008. The Southern Authority's annual lease payment was a hefty $500,000. The lawsuit, now dismissed, painted the Conservative government's actions as retaliatory, suggesting a deeper political rivalry at play.

Experience

Employment:
No experience information available.
Publications:
No publication information available.
Awards:
No award information available.

Rates

Hourly:
$250