My claims are factual and supported, but I could not give a zero rating. The purpose of my leaving a review is to warn others about my experience before they even consider calling her. Not only did Ursula not competently represent me, and file motions needed to force the opposing counsel to update her 35.1 affidavits, and Court documents that were being relied on by the Court as genuine, She abandoned me and my children when her failure to represent me . She would claim she would do one thing and later claim" as a lawyer,"  her go-to, that she decided to change her mind. She refused to represent me when the OCL violated my human rights and had herself removed, knowing my PTSD made representing myself impossible. She quit representing me while still on record. The opposing counsel attacked me, claiming i had no lawyer , served me without notice forcing me to go to a proceeding, that was never scheduled  when we left court, and then  after informing the SCJ that my claims were true, told me it was no longer her problem and not to contact her. She knew her failure and refusal to represent me were to blame and that the opposing lawyer's claims weren't true, but she refused to do anything about it . As a result of her abandoning me and my children at that time, I was forced to trial, without representation, and forced to represent myself  despite my PTSD and limitations, against a lawyer who is still using the inaccurate information, verified untrue, by the Police and Criminal Court, but still believed true by the Court. Again, all of my claims are supported and true, and the CBC interview is still out there supporting the same.  It's also important to note that yesterday, I reached out to her at her new office, and she just blocked me. If you check with the LSO, lawyers have a duty of care to their clients until they are actually removed from the record and everyone is notified. When the opposing Counsel is intentionally providing affidavits and evidence after the same has been verified inaccurate, or need to be updated to reflect criminal charges or convictions , the lawyer is supposed to address the matter and file a motion to have the amendments made. I still can't get the Court to address the above, and it's been three years. I lost everything, including my job, because of the way she handled my case. I filed complaints, and they have been escalated but that's not helping me now. Her refusal to fulfill her obligations has left me with no choice but to file a complaint against a judge. Trust me, you do not want to be put in that position. Look online for the online legal Service My Friendly Lawyer. Its the only thing that saved me. 

Ursula Miletic

Send an email to Ursula Miletic:

Customer Reviews

Be the first to review this lawyer.

Information

Rates