The past few years have seen rapid technological advancements that have impacted various areas of society, including the judicial system. As a result, remote court hearings have become more common, allowing individuals to participate in legal proceedings without physically going to a courthouse.

While this new approach has both supporters and detractors, this article seeks to explore the pros and cons of remote court hearings to determine if they are indeed beneficial.

Remote Court Hearing Advantages

Remote court hearings come with several advantages that make them attractive to both courts and participants.

One of the main benefits of remote court hearings is their convenience and accessibility, particularly for individuals living in rural or remote areas. These individuals often have to travel long distances to attend court hearings, which can be expensive and time-consuming.

Remote court hearings allow them to participate in legal proceedings from the comfort of their homes, without worrying about the cost or inconvenience of travelling.

Increased Efficiency

Remote court hearings also increase efficiency in the judicial system by eliminating the need for individuals to attend court physically. As a result, courts can save time and resources that would have otherwise been spent managing people’s attendance. This, in turn, allows for faster processing of court cases, leading to a quicker resolution of legal disputes.

Improved Safety

Remote court hearings also have the advantage of improving safety for everyone involved. With no need for individuals to attend court in person, remote hearings can reduce the risk of exposure to infectious diseases. This is particularly important in times of public health crises, where large gatherings can increase the spread of disease.

Remote Court Hearing Disadvantages

Remote court hearings come with some disadvantages, which also need to be considered. These disadvantages include:

One of the main challenges of remote court hearings is their reliance on technology. In case of technical difficulties, such as internet connectivity problems, the hearing may be delayed or even cancelled.

This can create a barrier for individuals who are not familiar with technology or who do not have access to reliable internet connections.

Limited Interpersonal Interaction

Virtual hearings can also limit interpersonal interaction between participants, making it challenging for lawyers to gauge the reactions of judges and juries.

Witnesses may find it challenging to present their evidence effectively, and it may also be more challenging for people to build trust and rapport with one another, which are essential in resolving legal disputes.

Remote court hearings can also reduce transparency in the judicial system. With no physical presence in the courtroom, it can be more challenging for the public to observe the proceedings and hold the court accountable for its actions. This can lead to concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the judicial system.

Statistics on Remote Court Hearings

Several studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of remote court hearings. Here are some statistics that shed light on the topic:

In the United States, 83% of court systems used some form of videoconferencing technology for court hearings in 2020, according to a study by the National Center for State Courts.

Another study conducted by the American Bar Association found that 91% of lawyers reported participating in a remote court hearing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In the United Kingdom, a survey conducted by the Ministry of Justice found that 78% of participants in remote court hearings were satisfied with the experience.

Lawyers Can Now Work From Hawaii

The largest change will be for sole practitioners or law firms with only a few lawyers.

Now that lawyers have been forced to work from home, they have realized that they could work from Hawaii once they are allowed to travel again.

Working on a claim response from the beach? Why not? Just go easy on the margaritas.

Young lawyers value a work-life balance. In 2019, 85 percent of millennial lawyers said work-life balance was important. The study covered 230 students studying law in universities all across Canada.

Law firms wanting to hire the top law students from law schools will need to understand changes in generational mindsets.

A young lawyer might want to work from 8 am-noon, go kayaking for three hours, then work from 3 pm to 7 pm.

Lawyers Are Important In Society

The rest of society will also need to watch for how law students’ and junior lawyers’ preferences are changing. Law students will go on to become managing partners, judges, and politicians.

Judges and politicians run society.

According to the Toronto Star, 15% of people in the House of Chambers are lawyers. At one point the percentage was 38%.

All judges were once law students.

There have also been counterless funny virtual court stories, which can be entertaining.

Law is changing, with workflow automation, virtual notary services, and virtual consultations with a lawyer.

Canada now has its first online platform for all Canadian lawyers. Soon, the platform will be the first verified review service, which will prevent fake 1-star reviews.

Find a Local Lawyer

Contact us

Remote Court Hearings: Navigating the New Normal