Hi LA lawyers, I have got a situation here that's way over my head, and I'm hoping you can shed some light on it. Here goes, straight out of Compton, Los Angeles, California. It's a bit of a doozy, so bear with me. The Core of It: A close friend of mine, let's call them Jamie, has been accused of a murder they swear they didn't commit. The incident supposedly took place a few months back near the Crystal Park Casino. Now, Jamie's been through some rough patches but murder? That's way out of their league. Twists and Turns: The case against Jamie seems like something out of a movie. They've got a shaky alibi for the night in question, claiming they were alone, working on music tracks at their home studio near the Compton Courthouse. No witnesses to back them up, just a timestamped project file on their computer. The Evidence?: From what I've heard, the evidence is circumstantial at best. Some surveillance footage from the area shows a figure that kinda matches Jamie's build, but it's blurry and could be anyone. Plus, a witness came forward, claiming they saw Jamie near the scene, but their story's changed a couple of times. Legal Labyrinth: Jamie's been assigned a public defender, but they seem overwhelmed and not too optimistic about the case. It's like they're preparing Jamie for the worst without even trying. The Ask: Given the circumstantial nature of the evidence, how strong is the prosecution's case likely to be, especially in LA County? Is there any way to leverage the digital timestamp of Jamie's music project as a solid alibi, or does it not hold much weight in court? What strategies can we pursue to strengthen Jamie's defense, especially considering the public defender's current stance? Are there specific legal resources or defense attorneys in Compton or LA that specialize in these kinds of cases?